There are indications that, the recently removed Governor of Imo State, Emeka Ihedioha, would approach the Supreme Court to seek review of the judgement that sacked him as the governor of the state.
At a press conference organised by some Civil Society Organisation (CSOs) in Abuja, the Executive Director of the Abuja Discussion Group (ADG), Manzo Abubakar, dropped the hint.
At the press conference, the CSOs queried the rationale behind the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Abubakar revealed that Ihedioha’s legal team will be at Supreme Court to seek a review of the judgment.
He said Ihedioha’s decision to return to the apex court was part of effort to deepen the nation’s democracy and explore democratic means of ensuing justice.
He said, “The judgment will go down in infamy and may make Nigeria a laughing stock in the comity of nations, if not reviewed”, adding that Section 176 (2b) of the constitution is clear that to be declared as governor, a candidate must have not only the majority of total votes cast but also 1/4 of the votes in 2/3 of the local governments of the state.
“It is axiomatic that nowhere in the petition or evidence did the petitioner, (Uzodinma) claim that he met the constitutional requirement of spread to be declared the winner”, the group stated.
The CSOs noted that, the Supreme Court, by the judgment has denied the Imo people the opportunity to choose their leaders, adding that, “We sympathise with their lordships, as mortals who are not infallible.
“To err is human. It would be practically impossible for any human to have read briefs and record of proceedings exceeding 5000 pages in the matter within 2 hours after hearing, when it also had pressure of time to deliver judgment in the remaining pending governorship appeals. No doubt, this accounted for the mistakes made by the Supreme Court”, the group stated.
Abubakar said, “The Supreme Court is supreme and can creatively reinvent its rules to do justice. It is necessary to do so now more that ever to save Nigerian democracy, constitutionalism and retrieve the judicial and justice system from its present opprobrium”.
